Leopold Stubenberg's marvelous SEP entry on neutral monism is now online.
Recent Posts
Recent Comments
- Luke Roelofs on Two articles on panpsychism
- Elijah Armstrong on Two articles on panpsychism
- Mike Johnson on Two articles on panpsychism
- djc on Four symposia
- Almereyda on Four symposia
- Pete Mandik on Four symposia
- David C. Braun on Phil in words of one syll
- djc on A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition
- james on A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition
- Biep on Actuality and Knowability
My site
Links
Other Sites
« Upcoming conferences | Main | Soames Chapter 5: Stalnaker's presuppositions »
February 08, 2005
Comments
The comments to this entry are closed.
That is a nice essay and very informative. I'm not sure I see the validity of placing panpsychism and neutral monism in opposition to one another, though.
I have a natural functionalist inclination about the essence of the mental. For instance, I believe that features such as memory, emotion, awareness of time, hope, belief and reason, require certain kinds of form and function. From there, it is a short step to concluding that there can be no mentality with out at least some features like those.
If one is a fundamentalist about experiencing as a panexperientalist would be, a view of experiencings as inherently neutral follows from there without too much difficulty. So why should something like a panexperientialist neutral monism be viewed as an oxymoron? Or have I misread Stubenberg?
Posted by: Gregg Rosenberg | February 09, 2005 at 08:42 AM